develooper Front page | perl.bootstrap | Postings from July 2000

Re: Working Group Proposal

From:
Dan Sugalski
Date:
July 24, 2000 19:07
Subject:
Re: Working Group Proposal
Message ID:
Pine.LNX.4.10.10007242215550.25520-100000@tuatha.sidhe.org
On Mon, 24 Jul 2000, Derek J. Balling wrote:

> I'll just say that "I disagree". I don't think you should EVER have 
> to recompile your perl binary to get something a program author 
> thought would be available in THEIR perl binary.

I strongly disagree as well. Maybe (*maybe*) particular backends will have
well-defined optional pieces missing (like, say, dynaloading, or the
lexer), but that's as far as I'd like to go.

I have no problem with (and would very much like to design in from the
start) the potential to *change* or overload the way keywords work via
modules, but that's a very different thing. 

					Dan




nntp.perl.org: Perl Programming lists via nntp and http.
Comments to Ask Bjørn Hansen at ask@perl.org | Group listing | About