Front page | perl.bootstrap |
Postings from July 2000
Re: specific plan
From:
Joshua N Pritikin
Date:
July 20, 2000 14:31
Subject:
Re: specific plan
Message ID:
20000720173112.A28285@ghostwheel.wks.na.deuba.com
On Thu, Jul 20, 2000 at 05:04:39PM -0400, jdporter@min.net wrote:
> Seems to me, either we start working on a perl6 implementation in C++
> (or whatever systems programming language) now, or we finish (start?)
> work on a real compiler for Perl5 -- and delay the perl6 core by a
> year or more. I don't see how these two can proceed in parallel,
> so a choice has to be made. Personally I'd opt for the former;
> the advantages of implementing perl6 in Perl5 are slim, imho.
Huh? I see perl5 as a cpp replacement.
--
Never ascribe to malice that which can be explained by stupidity.
(via, but not speaking for Deutsche Bank)
-
RE: Threads, reentrancy, and suchlike things (was: Re: Working Group Proposal)
by Moore, Paul
-
RE: Threads, reentrancy, and suchlike things
by Moore, Paul
-
Re: implementation strategy (was Re: Working Group Proposal)
by Benjamin Stuhl
-
RE: Threads, reentrancy, and suchlike things (was: Re: Working Group Proposal)
by Moore, Paul
-
Re: Threads, reentrancy, and suchlike things (was: Re: Working Gr oup Proposal)
by simon
-
Working Group Proposal
by Kurt D. Starsinic
-
Re: Threads, reentrancy, and suchlike things (was: Re: Working Group Proposal)
by Benjamin Stuhl