Re: Integrity of RFCs (was RFC 7 (v1) Higher resolution time values)

Hugo writes:
> I suspect there was a non-space character between the '10' and the 's'
> above, which got lost. Either we need to restrict the encodings we
> use, or we need somehow to ensure the encodings we use survive
> transmission.
> 
> I'm not sure where in the process this one got lost.

Probably when passing through me, but I'm not sure how.  I'll keep
an eye out for it in future.

Nat

• Integrity of RFCs (was RFC 7 (v1) Higher resolution time values) by Hugo
• Re: Integrity of RFCs (was RFC 7 (v1) Higher resolution time values) by Nathan Torkington