Re: RFC 10 (v2) Filehandles should use C<*> as a type pr

On Sat, Aug 05, 2000 at 12:19:42AM -0600, Nathan Torkington wrote:
> My current thinking about the status field, by the way, is to have
> three possible values: developing, frozen, retracted.  Any problems
> with that?  If not, I'll make a decision by Monday.

Sounds good to me.

-Scott
-- 
Jonathan Scott Duff
duff@cbi.tamucc.edu

• Re: RFC 10 (v2) Filehandles should use C<*> as a type pr by Nathan Torkington
• Re: RFC 10 (v2) Filehandles should use C<*> as a type pr by Jonathan Scott Duff