Front page | perl.bootstrap |
Postings from August 2000
On Wed, Aug 16, 2000 at 07:34:51PM -0400, Bradley M. Kuhn wrote: > > * Standardize the STATUS section, which contains one line of data that > indicates the status. Status can be exactly one of the following states > (subject to additional possible states, of course): > > In-Discussion > Superseded-by: L<perl6-RFCs/"$NUMBER"> > Approved-by: $NAME $EMAIL > Rejected-by: $NAME $EMAIL > Defunct RFCs are not approved or rejected. The author may withdraw them, however. Superseded is a good idea, though. > * Addition of a REQUIRES section, which is a list of RFCs, one per line. > This section indicates that this RFC is useless if the listed RFC(s) are > not approved. > > * Addition of a "CONFLICTS WITH" section, which is a list of RFCs, one per > line. This section indicates that this RFC is in direct conflict with > the listed RFC(s), and that it is impossible to approve this RFC if any > one of the listed RFCs are approved. I like these ideas, too. K. -- Kirrily Robert -- <skud@netizen.com.au> -- http://netizen.com.au/ Open Source development, consulting and solutions Level 10, 500 Collins St, Melbourne VIC 3000 Phone: +61 3 9614 0949 Fax: +61 3 9614 0948 Mobile: +61 410 664 994Thread Previous | Thread Next