Automated smoke report for branch smoke-me/khw-clz 5.35.1 patch 5e7525dc5ce0601a1d28ebcd211f778acffe0fc8 v5.35.0-137-g5e7525dc5c cjg-freebsd11: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v2 @ 2.10GHz (amd64/1 cpu) on freebsd - 11.4-RELEASE-p9 using clang++ version FreeBSD Clang 10.0.0 (git@github.com:llvm/llvm-project.git llvmorg-10.0.0-0-gd32170dbd5b) smoketime 18 minutes 45 seconds (average 1 minute 33.750 seconds) Summary: FAIL(m) O = OK F = Failure(s), extended report at the bottom X = Failure(s) under TEST but not under harness ? = still running or test results not (yet) available Build failures during: - = unknown or N/A c = Configure, m = make, M = make (after miniperl), t = make test-prep v5.35.0-137-g5e7525dc5c Configuration (common) -Dcc=clang++ ----------- --------------------------------------------------------- m m m m -Duse64bitall m m -Duselongdouble m m -Duseithreads m m -Duseithreads -Duse64bitall m m -Duseithreads -Duselongdouble | +--------- -DDEBUGGING +----------- no debugging Testsuite was run only with 'harness' Tests skipped on user request: # One test name on a line MANIFEST did not declare '.mailmap' Compiler messages(gcc): gv.c:289:12: warning: the argument to '__builtin_assume' has side effects that will be discarded [-Wassume] ./perl.h:3912:39: note: expanded from macro 'ASSUME' regcomp.c:10671:13: warning: converting the result of '?:' with integer constants to a boolean always evaluates to 'true' [-Wtautological-constant-compare] ./regcharclass.h:917:8: note: expanded from macro 'is_MULTI_CHAR_FOLD_latin1_safe' regcomp.c:10705:19: error: variable-sized object may not be initialized ./utf8.h:708:35: note: expanded from macro 'UTF8_MAX_FOLD_CHAR_EXPAND' regcomp.c:10755:13: warning: converting the result of '?:' with integer constants to a boolean always evaluates to 'true' [-Wtautological-constant-compare] ./regcharclass.h:420:49: note: expanded from macro 'is_MULTI_CHAR_FOLD_utf8_safe' ./regcharclass.h:247:8: note: expanded from macro 'is_MULTI_CHAR_FOLD_utf8_safe_part0_' ./regcharclass.h:420:92: note: expanded from macro 'is_MULTI_CHAR_FOLD_utf8_safe' ./regcharclass.h:279:9: note: expanded from macro 'is_MULTI_CHAR_FOLD_utf8_safe_part1_' ./regcharclass.h:302:6: note: expanded from macro 'is_MULTI_CHAR_FOLD_utf8_safe_part1_' ./regcharclass.h:303:9: note: expanded from macro 'is_MULTI_CHAR_FOLD_utf8_safe_part1_' ./regcharclass.h:309:9: note: expanded from macro 'is_MULTI_CHAR_FOLD_utf8_safe_part1_' ./regcharclass.h:426:8: note: expanded from macro 'is_MULTI_CHAR_FOLD_utf8_safe' ./regcharclass.h:479:19: note: expanded from macro 'is_MULTI_CHAR_FOLD_utf8_safe' ./regcharclass.h:332:8: note: expanded from macro 'is_MULTI_CHAR_FOLD_utf8_safe_part2_' ./regcharclass.h:479:62: note: expanded from macro 'is_MULTI_CHAR_FOLD_utf8_safe' ./regcharclass.h:390:8: note: expanded from macro 'is_MULTI_CHAR_FOLD_utf8_safe_part3_' regcomp.c:15225:37: warning: converting the result of '?:' with integer constants to a boolean always evaluates to 'true' [-Wtautological-constant-compare] ./regcharclass.h:994:4: note: expanded from macro 'is_THREE_CHAR_FOLD_HEAD_utf8_safe' ./regcharclass.h:1002:8: note: expanded from macro 'is_THREE_CHAR_FOLD_HEAD_utf8_safe' ./regcharclass.h:1004:8: note: expanded from macro 'is_THREE_CHAR_FOLD_HEAD_utf8_safe' ./regcharclass.h:1009:8: note: expanded from macro 'is_THREE_CHAR_FOLD_HEAD_utf8_safe' ./regcharclass.h:1011:8: note: expanded from macro 'is_THREE_CHAR_FOLD_HEAD_utf8_safe' ./regcharclass.h:1023:4: note: expanded from macro 'is_THREE_CHAR_FOLD_HEAD_utf8_safe' ./regcharclass.h:1042:4: note: expanded from macro 'is_THREE_CHAR_FOLD_HEAD_utf8_safe' regcomp.c:15276:38: warning: converting the result of '?:' with integer constants to a boolean always evaluates to 'true' [-Wtautological-constant-compare] regcomp.c:15324:37: warning: converting the result of '?:' with integer constants to a boolean always evaluates to 'true' [-Wtautological-constant-compare] ./regcharclass.h:1066:4: note: expanded from macro 'is_THREE_CHAR_FOLD_HEAD_latin1_safe' regcomp.c:15345:38: warning: converting the result of '?:' with integer constants to a boolean always evaluates to 'true' [-Wtautological-constant-compare] toke.c:4327:5: warning: result of comparison against a string literal is unspecified (use an explicit string comparison function instead) [-Wstring-compare] ./scope.h:212:25: note: expanded from macro 'LEAVE_with_name' /usr/include/assert.h:54:21: note: expanded from macro 'assert' toke.c:6277:20: warning: result of comparison against a string literal is unspecified (use an explicit string comparison function instead) [-Wstring-compare] toke.c:12106:17: warning: result of comparison against a string literal is unspecified (use an explicit string comparison function instead) [-Wstring-compare] regcomp.c:8247:37: warning: result of comparison against a string literal is unspecified (use an explicit string comparison function instead) [-Wstring-compare] regcomp.c:6675:13: note: expanded from macro 'CHECK_RESTUDY_GOTO_butfirst' regcomp.c:8295:9: warning: result of comparison against a string literal is unspecified (use an explicit string comparison function instead) [-Wstring-compare] Non-Fatal messages(gcc): -- Report by Test::Smoke v1.71 running on perl 5.30.2 (Reporter v0.053 / Smoker v0.046)Thread Next