David Wheeler wrote: > The normalization stuff in DateTime::Format::Duration gets us part of > the way there, but not quite, as if I say, "23 hours, 90 minutes", it > will return "24 hours 29 minutes", which is not quite the same as what > was initially specified. That's probably as close as you can get .. > At any rate, does this make sense to folks? If so, I'd be willing to > hack something into DateTime::Duration to support this. Comments? The problem with this is that you'd really want to use something other than DateTime::Duration as DT:D is designed for Date math. DT:D Proposal (11 hours, 90 minutes) 750m 11h 90m + (32 minutes) 32m 32m = 782m 11h 122m * 2 1564m 22h 244m ... The more we do, the more confusing your proposed method gets. Sure you could keep it separate inside DT:D but then you'll have to do the math for both the current and the proposed values every time. I'd be thinking of just storing the values as a hash(ref) that you later feed back into DT:D when you need to. That way you can store it however you need to. (Personally, I'd be happy as a user if I asked for 90m if it returned 1h30m .. but I imagine different things need different units) Cheers! Rick MeashamThread Previous | Thread Next