develooper Front page | perl.datetime | Postings from January 2006

XS & Leap second questions

Thread Next
From:
Chase Venters
Date:
January 18, 2006 18:23
Subject:
XS & Leap second questions
Message ID:
200601182023.23900.chase.venters@clientec.com
Greetings fellow Perl hackers,
	I'm attracted to DateTime's very comprehensive approach at dealing with time 
(which I personally consider to be one of the biggest annoyances and 
challenges in programming).
	Unfortunately, I've been plagued by an oddity in the way DateTime handles 
leap seconds in face of the Olson timezone database for some time. This shows 
up as test failures:

t/04epoch...............NOK 12#     Failed test (t/04epoch.t at line 40)
#          got: '997120978'
#     expected: '997121000'
t/04epoch...............NOK 14#     Failed test (t/04epoch.t at line 43)
#          got: '2'
#     expected: '3'
t/04epoch...............NOK 20#     Failed test (t/04epoch.t at line 81)
#          got: '1049160580'
#     expected: '1049160602'
t/04epoch...............NOK 22#     Failed test (t/04epoch.t at line 84)
#          got: '29'
#     expected: '30'
t/04epoch...............NOK 24#     Failed test (t/04epoch.t at line 90)
#          got: '1049167780'
#     expected: '1049167802'
t/04epoch...............ok 32/32# Looks like you failed 5 tests of 32.
t/04epoch...............dubious

	This happens when /etc/localtime is linked to a timezone 
in /usr/share/zoneinfo/right as opposed to /usr/share/zoneinfo. The problem 
bites me in the ass, unfortunately, because I tend to store date / time 
values in SQL as an epoch rather than a native type (less back and forth 
conversion required). This can result in my events drifting 22 seconds, etc.
	Also, it's been clear to me that using DateTime heavily is a good way to 
quickly kill performance. Pages that took 20ms to render jump to 500ms when I 
try to do something "simple" like apply a recurrence set to a month.
	I started peering into DateTime internals and have noticed that the xs seems 
a little... lite? Curiously, I read the text supplied with the distribution 
and noticed this:

NOTE TO FUTURE DEVELOPERS:

Attempting to implement add_duration in XS actually seemed to slow
date math operations down.  Sad but true.

	Curious - what was the strategy? What do you assume to be the bottleneck? C 
has *got* to be faster at math than Perl, so I have a feeling the above 
remark is specific to a particular implementation approach.
	Along those lines, are there any known outstanding areas where DateTime could 
use some optimization? I'm handy with C, very handy with Perl and somewhat 
capable with XS... I'd like to help.

Thanks,
Chase Venters

Thread Next


nntp.perl.org: Perl Programming lists via nntp and http.
Comments to Ask Bjørn Hansen at ask@perl.org | Group listing | About