Front page | perl.fwp |
Postings from February 2005
Re: "Secret" operators
Thread Previous
|
Thread Next
From:
Quantum Mechanic
Date:
February 1, 2005 12:12
Subject:
Re: "Secret" operators
Message ID:
20050201201251.57765.qmail@web14025.mail.yahoo.com
--- Jos� Castro <jac@natura.di.uminho.pt> wrote:
> * Quantum Mechanic (quantum_mechanic_1964@yahoo.com)
> wrote:
> > $foo = ($bar) = (9,8,7);
> >
> > RHS list
> > ($bar) array
> > $bar <- 7 (rest discarded)
>
> No, no, no.
>
> $bar <- 9
>
Yes, that was a typo -- thanks.
> It's the same as
>
> $foo = ($bar, undef, undef) = (9, 8, 7);
>
> Now the funny thing is that the result from
>
> $foo = ($bar, undef, undef, undef) = (9, 8, 7);
>
> is still the same :-)
Ah, but that supports my theory. It's not the LHS of
the ($bar,...)= assignment that generates the data for
$foo -- it's the RHS. The LHS of the ($bar,...)=
assignment determines the *context* of the $foo=
assignment.
Q.E.D. The quantity of elements on the LHS don't
matter, but the quality of the LHS does.
-QM
=====
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Quantum Mechanics: The dreams stuff is made of
__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Mail - now with 250MB free storage. Learn more.
http://info.mail.yahoo.com/mail_250
Thread Previous
|
Thread Next