On Sat, Sep 23, 2000 at 09:52:51AM +1100, Jeremy Howard wrote: > > > > $x = 3 * @_; > > > > > > > > suddently being equivalent to > > > > > > > > $x = @_; > > > > > > > > does not look very promising... > > Why are these equivalent? RFC 82 only applies in list context. Am I missing > something? Yes, the proposal to make map 3*$_ semantic to work in a scalar context too (to avoid cryptocontext). IlyaThread Previous | Thread Next