Front page | perl.perl6.language |
Postings from December 2004
On Sat, 04 Dec 2004 11:03:03 -0600, Rod Adams <rod@rodadams.net> wrote:
> Okay, this rant is more about the \s<\s than \s=\s. To me, it is easier
> to understand the grouping of line 1 than line 2 below:
>
> if( $a<$b && $c<$d ) {...}
> if( $a < $b && $c < $d ) {...}
>
> In line2, my mind has to stop and ask: is that "($a < $b) && ($c < $d)",
> or "$a < ($b && $c) < $d". It quickly comes to the right answer, but the
> question never comes up in the first line. If I wanted to use more
> parens for clarity, I'd use LISP.
>
I've got used to write it as
if( $a < $b and $c < $d) {...}
already. if it could help.. :)
Thread Previous
|
Thread Next