Re: something between run and qx() ?

Hi Liz!

> sub prefix:<`>(*@a) { (run @a, :out).out.lines }

Thanks for this example, I now can write things like

	.say for grep / '.txt' $ /, `<ls>
	for `<ls> { .say if / '.txt' $ / }

which made me remember I wrote something similar (but not working) for
the FOSDEM talk:

sub prefix:<`>(|c) is tighter(&infix:<.>) { (run :out, c).out.lines }

the `is tighter` thing was because I hoped I could write something like

`<ls>.grep( / '.txt' $ / ).say

Is is something to do to fix it ?

Thanks everything you do on Raku!

regards
-- 
Marc Chantreux
Pôle de Calcul et Services Avancés à la Recherche (CESAR)
http://annuaire.unistra.fr/p/20200

• something between run and qx() ? by Marc Chantreux
• Re: something between run and qx() ? by Brian Duggan
• Re: something between run and qx() ? by Marc Chantreux
• Re: something between run and qx() ? by Elizabeth Mattijsen
• Re: something between run and qx() ? by Marc Chantreux
• Re: something between run and qx() ? by Elizabeth Mattijsen
• Re: something between run and qx() ? by Marc Chantreux