Re: perl_ck_warn_d not found in perl58.dll (win 32)

Front page | perl.par | Postings from October 2006

Re: perl_ck_warn_d not found in perl58.dll (win 32)

Thread Previous

From:

Sisyphus

Date:

October 31, 2006 03:27

Subject:

Re: perl_ck_warn_d not found in perl58.dll (win 32)

Message ID:

001e01c6fcde$d168bf80$0100a8c0@desktop


----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Steffen Mueller" <rt8363b02@sneakemail.com>
To: <par@perl.org>; <danielmcbrearty@gmail.com>;
<P.Schaffnit@access.rwth-aachen.de>
Sent: Tuesday, October 31, 2006 10:07 PM
Subject: Re: perl_ck_warn_d not found in perl58.dll (win 32)


> Daniel McBrearty schrieb:
> > maybe I'll mail activestate and ask them if there's a chance they
> > could start making it available ...
>
> You'll probably have a hard time. They sell a competing product
> (perlapp). It's not that they'd specifically remove PAR from their
> automatic builds, I guess, but they won't go through a lot of trouble to
> make it available. (Or at least I wouldn't if I was them.)

I'm not so sure that they think that way :-)

>
> Anyhow, looking at the PAR test results on their build system, I see
> that it's not PAR that can't be built, but one of its prerequisites
> Getopt::ArgvFile. I wonder why, though, since Getopt::ArgvFile is a
> simple pure-perl module if I've ever seen one.

From
http://ppm.activestate.com/BuildStatus/5.8-windows/windows-5.8/Getopt-ArgvFile-1.10.txt :
	D:\cpanrun\build\5-8-0\bin\perl.exe "-MExtUtils::Command::MM" "-e"
"test_harness(0, 'blib\lib', 'blib\arch')" t/*.t
t/base.......#     Failed test (t/resolvepathes.t at line 67)
#     Structures begin differing at:
#          $got->[7] = 'D:/cpanrudubious
	Test returned status 1 (wstat 256, 0x100)
DIED. FAILED test 4
	Failed 1/4 tests, 75.00% okay
t/use1.............ok
t/use2.............ok
Failed Test       Stat Wstat Total Fail  Failed  List of Failed
------------------------------------------------------------------------NMAK
E : fatal error U1077: 'D:\cpanrun\build\5-8-0\bin\perl.exe' : return code
'0xff'
Stop.
---
t\resolvepathes.t    1   256     4    1  25.00%  4
 > Hence: If you "fix" Getopt::ArgvFile so that its tests pass on AS Perl >
(they do on Strawberry win32), there'll probably a PAR from > ActiveState's
repository. They may well do that, if asked. (Best to seek that sort of
assistance from ActiveState's PPM mailing list.)>I would still suggest
sticking to the > uwinnipeg or bribes builds, though. If the op has visual
studio 6.0 (in which case he will be using the same compiler as was used to
build his perl) I would probably be recommending that he build PAR himself.
Otherwise, yes, I agree with you.Cheers,Rob

Thread Previous