On 2022-12-02 21:11, Darren Duncan wrote: > [...] > So in summary, I agree with the match-case and eqv/=== additions to > core, but I feel the "in" should be left for the likes of List::Util. > The first 2 have a high win for core syntax AND they are relatively > uncomplicated, while the last 1 is a lot more complicated in its > variants and best left in modules, albeit possibly core-bundled modules. I'd love to have the 'in' into Perl, with a default of 'eq', much like how 'sort' defaults to 'cmp'. And I still mourn for 'dor' to not be there yet. -- Ruud P.S. I always rejected usage of: lexical_topic; switch; indirect; multidimensional; bareword_filehandles; looks_like_number; $@ checks. I strongly support weeding out value-based semantics, like is done with bitwise. And I'm longing for more mature signatures, so I no longer have to code like \my($x,$y)=\(@_); :)Thread Previous | Thread Next