develooper Front page | perl.qa | Postings from April 2006

Re: Non-Perl TAP implementations

Thread Previous | Thread Next
From:
Adam Kennedy
Date:
April 19, 2006 18:28
Subject:
Re: Non-Perl TAP implementations
Message ID:
4446E311.1040405@phase-n.com
I can't remember the exact list off the top of my head.

At the time, I did the cascade tracing by hand using the CPANTS webpage, 
it took for-bloody-ever. The only reason I kept doing as deep as I did 
was that I kept being astonished at what was getting caught in the web.

There's been something of a shuffle in there since, a lot of people 
dropped Test::Warn (which was a big branch) and Test::Builder::Tester 
merged in.

I'm hoping, if we can get this CDBI-SQLite stuff working, to have 
similar things running automatically in future, so I could actually 
answer your question.

Adam K

Fergal Daly wrote:
> On 4/18/06, Adam Kennedy <adam@phase-n.com> wrote:
>> The aformentioned change to Test::Builder broke 3 different Test-Testing
>> modules that relied on it.
> 
> 3? I only know of 2 - Test::Builder::Tester (which scrapes and broke)
> and Test::Tester (which doesn't scrape and didn't break). Is there
> another Test-Testing module?
> 
> F
> 
>> That broke 28 Test modules which used them.
>>
>> That broke 115 various CPAN modules.
>>
>> That broken 880 other CPAN modules.
>>
>> And so on and so forth, until the end number ended up somewhere between
>> 2000 and 3000 distributions.
>>
>> So 30% of all CPAN modules broke.
>>
>> This included things like almost ALL of WWW::, because Mechanize got
>> sucked into it. God knows how many darkpan Mech modules got hurt as well.
>>
>> Do we blame ALL of those 100s of developers?
>>
>> Does blame even matter at that point?
>>
>> This is what I mean by becoming an API even though you didn't want to be.
>>
>> Adam K
>>

Thread Previous | Thread Next


nntp.perl.org: Perl Programming lists via nntp and http.
Comments to Ask Bjørn Hansen at ask@perl.org | Group listing | About