On 19 Apr 2006, at 09:02, Ovid wrote: [snip] > From a parser standpoint, there's no clean way of distinguishing that > from what the test functions are going to output. As a result, I > really think that "diag" and normal test failure information should be > marked differently (instead of the /^# / that we see). [snip] I've thought in the past about about using /^## / for non-test related diagnostics ## Start the fribble tests ok 1 - fribble foo not ok 2 - fribble bar # Failed test 'fribble bar' # in untitled text 2 at line 5. # got: 'baz' # expected: 'bar' ## Start the blart tests # ok 1 - blart foo ... etc ... Reads reasonably to me and has the advantage of being backward compatible. ? AdrianThread Previous | Thread Next