develooper Front page | perl.bootstrap | Postings from August 2000

Re: RFCs: two proposals for change

Thread Previous | Thread Next
From:
Dan Sugalski
Date:
August 4, 2000 09:14
Subject:
Re: RFCs: two proposals for change
Message ID:
4.3.2.7.0.20000804120858.00c4fad0@24.8.96.48
At 12:55 AM 8/5/00 +0900, Simon Cozens wrote:
>The question is, then, how do we sufficiently register apathy?

I think it's the job of the WG chair the RFC is ultimately presented to to 
notice apathy. I'm tempted to say that general apathy dooms an RFC as well, 
though the big WG chair certainly has the option to say yes for the tepid 
suggestions. (Barring a Larry veto, of course)

					Dan

--------------------------------------"it's like this"-------------------
Dan Sugalski                          even samurai
dan@sidhe.org                         have teddy bears and even
                                      teddy bears get drunk
Thread Previous | Thread Next

nntp.perl.org: Perl Programming lists via nntp and http.
Comments to Ask Bjørn Hansen at ask@perl.org | Group listing | About