develooper Front page | perl.bootstrap | Postings from August 2000

Re: RFCs: two proposals for change

Thread Previous | Thread Next
From:
Chaim Frenkel
Date:
August 4, 2000 12:04
Subject:
Re: RFCs: two proposals for change
Message ID:
m33dkkhmpu.fsf@csamnycln01.nyc.csam.com
I'd like to find out how to notice the apathy. How do you tell the difference
between lurkers and apathy?

<chaim>

>>>>> "DS" == Dan Sugalski <dan@sidhe.org> writes:

DS> At 12:55 AM 8/5/00 +0900, Simon Cozens wrote:
>> The question is, then, how do we sufficiently register apathy?

DS> I think it's the job of the WG chair the RFC is ultimately presented to to 
DS> notice apathy. I'm tempted to say that general apathy dooms an RFC as well, 
DS> though the big WG chair certainly has the option to say yes for the tepid 
DS> suggestions. (Barring a Larry veto, of course)

-- 
Chaim Frenkel					     Nonlinear Knowledge, Inc.
chaimf@pobox.com				               +1-718-236-0183
Thread Previous | Thread Next

nntp.perl.org: Perl Programming lists via nntp and http.
Comments to Ask Bjørn Hansen at ask@perl.org | Group listing | About