develooper Front page | perl.bootstrap | Postings from August 2000

Re: RFCs: two proposals for change

Thread Previous | Thread Next
From:
Andy Dougherty
Date:
August 7, 2000 06:45
Subject:
Re: RFCs: two proposals for change
Message ID:
Pine.SOL.4.10.10008070938090.19622-100000@maxwell.phys.lafayette.edu
On Mon, 7 Aug 2000, Grant M. wrote:

> I agree with Mr.Brand. Silence does not indicate apathy (it actually
> indicates points more toward consent). 

No, I disagree.  It also often indicates a belief that a particular point
is so obviously wrong that it should be allowed -- nay encouraged -- to
die a quick death.  In such a case, I tend to believe that any sort of
post (positive or negative) that might prolong the thread's life is
probably a waste of everybody's time and will only provoke more posts.  
So I remain silent in the hope the thread will go away.

Fortunately, I trust the working group chairs[*] to exercise a significant
amount of judgment in such areas, so I don't worry about it too much.

-- 
    Andy Dougherty		doughera@lafayette.edu
    Dept. of Physics
    Lafayette College, Easton PA 18042

[*]Did we ever come up with a better name for either "working group" or
"chair"?



Thread Previous | Thread Next


nntp.perl.org: Perl Programming lists via nntp and http.
Comments to Ask Bjørn Hansen at ask@perl.org | Group listing | About