develooper Front page | perl.perl5.porters | Postings from April 2006

Re: Underscores in version numbers?

From:
John Peacock
Date:
April 5, 2006 05:02
Subject:
Re: Underscores in version numbers?
Message ID:
4433B1C6.9010106@rowman.com
Andreas J. Koenig wrote:
> It has been taught for dual life modules. 

Mostly.  I just went through installing some modules, and I don't have any
details, and in the middle of trying to install something, CPAN went and tried
to install perl5.8.8; I'll go back over my steps and confirm.

> For all other modules the
> underscore will prevent indexing but this doesn't seem important
> because as soon as these modules get a second life, they gat a new and
> higher version number anyway.

In practice, yes, but there have been times when bleadperl was used to prove the
changes were stable, prior to release to CPAN, so I wouldn't count on the
underscores being completely unimportant.  If the CPAN release is identical to
the core release, indeed the $VERSION should also be identical.  Doesn't Randal
have a script he runs from time to time to check this?

John

-- 
John Peacock
Director of Information Research and Technology
Rowman & Littlefield Publishing Group
4720 Boston Way
Lanham, MD 20706
301-459-3366 x.5010
fax 301-429-5747



nntp.perl.org: Perl Programming lists via nntp and http.
Comments to Ask Bjørn Hansen at ask@perl.org | Group listing | About