develooper Front page | perl.perl5.porters | Postings from April 2006

Re: Underscores in version numbers?

From:
Rafael Garcia-Suarez
Date:
April 5, 2006 05:51
Subject:
Re: Underscores in version numbers?
Message ID:
b77c1dce0604050551i106fef0bk59b3c0b145bba557@mail.gmail.com
On 05/04/06, Jan Dubois <jand@activestate.com> wrote:
> >> Is there a good reason to put these underscores into the version
> >> numbers?
> >
> > Yes, it prevents CPAN/CPANPLUS from upgrading some poor schmuck
> > running 5.6. to the most recent Perl with the module at a higher
> > version (if I remember correctly).
>
> Of course the CPAN indexer could just be taught to ignore modules
> included in core Perl distributions.

IIRC it already does : that's the role of the META.yml included in
perl's tarball.

on the other hand that '_' convention is also used by search.cpan.org
to know which modules are alpha.

If it turns out to be unneccessary, I'd be happy to drop it for dual
lived core modules.



nntp.perl.org: Perl Programming lists via nntp and http.
Comments to Ask Bjørn Hansen at ask@perl.org | Group listing | About