On Wed, 26 Jul 2000, you wrote: > On Tue, 25 Jul 2000, Matthew Cline wrote: > > > > 2) Open subscription, but it's very easy to get kicked off the list, > > > > to keep things tightly focused. > > > > > > How easy, by whom, and for what? > > > > Easy for the WG members. The WG members would kick off [...] > > That doesn't make any sense to me. The "WG members" are whoever is > subscribed to the mailinglist or read the archives or get the list > on audio tapes or whatever. Or maybe the "WG members" are only > whoever is posting to the list. But the point is the same: there is > no formal list of "WG members" OK, I wasn't communicating very clearly. I had some idea that there would be some set of core Perl developers, people doing the lions share of the Perl6 work, and that these people would be in control of the lists, and be able to kick people off. But now that I think about it, I have no idea if there can or will be such a distinction been core developers and non-core develoeprs. -- Matthew Cline | Suppose you were an idiot. And suppose that matt@nightrealms.com | you were a member of Congress. But I repeat | myself. -- Mark TwainThread Previous | Thread Next