develooper Front page | perl.bootstrap | Postings from July 2000

Re: Working Group Proposal

From:
John Porter
Date:
July 21, 2000 10:26
Subject:
Re: Working Group Proposal
Message ID:
20000721132615.E10363@min.net
Moore, Paul wrote:
> Reusing a compiler parser on that is likely to be a challenge :-)
> 
> I don't have a problem with wanting to make it more possible to handle Perl
> in this sort of context - but don't assume that splitting out the parser is
> a "magic bullet". 

That's exactly why I'm in favor of having a well-defined grammer that lets
you write your own parser if you think you need to.


> And I don't think
> that redesigning Perl's syntax to be easily parseable is going to get
> anywhere - the result just wouldn't be Perl, in some very fundamental ways.

I don't believe that has to be the case.

-- 
John Porter

	Aus tiefem Traum bin ich erwacht.




nntp.perl.org: Perl Programming lists via nntp and http.
Comments to Ask Bjørn Hansen at ask@perl.org | Group listing | About