Front page | perl.bootstrap |
Postings from July 2000
Re: embedded perl
From:
Joshua N Pritikin
Date:
July 20, 2000 10:34
Subject:
Re: embedded perl
Message ID:
20000720133439.W17718@ghostwheel.wks.na.deuba.com
On Thu, Jul 20, 2000 at 01:17:18PM -0400, Joshua N Pritikin wrote:
> Yah. Perl5 has been drifting this way for a while already. I just
> propose to factor it better. CPP riddled code is hard to maintain.
> Even so, I think CPP is adding a level of indirection between the
> correct conceptual places. Note that some of Sarathy's work towards 5.6
> involved inventing and regularizing CPP macro patterns.
I guess I'm thinking like this after reading all those articles on
generating the minimum code needed for your favorite embedded kernel
implementation.
--
Never ascribe to malice that which can be explained by stupidity.
(via, but not speaking for Deutsche Bank)
-
RE: Threads, reentrancy, and suchlike things
by Moore, Paul
-
Working Group Proposal
by Kurt D. Starsinic
-
Re: Threads, reentrancy, and suchlike things (was: Re: Working Group Proposal)
by Benjamin Stuhl
-
Re: Threads, reentrancy, and suchlike things (was: Re: Working Gr oup Proposal)
by simon
-
RE: Threads, reentrancy, and suchlike things (was: Re: Working Group Proposal)
by Moore, Paul
-
RE: Threads, reentrancy, and suchlike things (was: Re: Working Group Proposal)
by Moore, Paul
-
Re: implementation strategy (was Re: Working Group Proposal)
by Benjamin Stuhl