At 10:54 AM 7/25/00 -0400, Kurt D. Starsinic wrote:
>On Mon, Jul 24, 2000 at 06:46:22PM -0700, Derek J. Balling wrote:
> > I'll just say that "I disagree". I don't think you should EVER have
> > to recompile your perl binary to get something a program author
> > thought would be available in THEIR perl binary.
> >
> > A perl program should work "anywhere" unless the end-user has
> > explicitly removed functionality from his/her perl-binary.
>
> Think embedded systems. Think handhelds. Think bleeding-edge
>experimentation. Think Penguin. Think Safe. Think Different.
Think working group for language capability partitioning, since it's
off-topic here, though a very useful topic. (Think "Dan is finally
realizing exactly how *big* the little area he volunteered for is"... :)
Dan
--------------------------------------"it's like this"-------------------
Dan Sugalski even samurai
dan@sidhe.org have teddy bears and even
teddy bears get drunk