develooper Front page | perl.bootstrap | Postings from July 2000

Re: implementation strategy (was Re: Working Group Proposal)

From:
Brock
Date:
July 20, 2000 12:42
Subject:
Re: implementation strategy (was Re: Working Group Proposal)
Message ID:
Pine.SOL.4.10.10007201220530.3141-100000@k2.llnl.gov


On Thu, 20 Jul 2000, John Porter wrote:

> Brock wrote:
> > 
> > This parser would output a Parse Tree, which could then be traversed.
> > Traversal could be done either in perl, or in the proposed meta-language,
> > though I'd prefer a perl solution.
> 
> I think Brock makes a good point: the compiler and interpreter could be
> cleanly separated; of course, they both need to be new in the perl6
> project; but the interpreter, for example, could be functionally
> equivalent to the one in the current perl5.  The (new) compiler could
> be made perl5-compatible at first, and changed (since it will now be
> easy to change) as perl6 is developed.  Or we could just leave it at
> that and declare victory.  :-)
> 

The interpreter would be Just Another Backend.

--Brock





nntp.perl.org: Perl Programming lists via nntp and http.
Comments to Ask Bjørn Hansen at ask@perl.org | Group listing | About